Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 35
Filtrar
1.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37919201

RESUMEN

Infection of a native joint, commonly referred to as septic arthritis, is a medical emergency because of the risk of joint destruction and subsequent sequelae. Its diagnosis requires a high level of suspicion. These guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of septic arthritis in children and adults are intended for use by any physician caring for patients with suspected or confirmed septic arthritis. They have been developed by a multidisciplinary panel with representatives from the Bone and Joint Infections Study Group (GEIO) belonging to the Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (SEIMC), the Spanish Society of Paediatric Infections (SEIP) and the Spanish Society of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology (SECOT), and two rheumatologists. The recommendations are based on evidence derived from a systematic literature review and, failing that, on the opinion of the experts who prepared these guidelines. A detailed description of the background, methods, summary of evidence, the rationale supporting each recommendation, and gaps in knowledge can be found online in the complete document.

2.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 76(4): 1085-1093, 2021 03 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33496335

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Available information about infection after spine instrumentation (IASI) and its management are scarce. We aimed to analyse DAIR (debridement, antibiotics and implant retention) prognosis and evaluate effectiveness of short antibiotic courses on early forms. METHODS: Multicentre retrospective study of patients with IASI managed surgically (January 2010-December 2016). Risk factors for failure were analysed by multivariate Cox regression and differences between short and long antibiotic treatment were evaluated with a propensity score-matched analysis. RESULTS: Of the 411 IASI cases, 300 (73%) presented in the first month after surgery, 48 in the second month, 22 in the third and 41 thereafter. Infections within the first 2 months (early cases) occurred mainly to older patients, with local inflammatory signs and predominance of Enterobacteriaceae, unlike those in the later periods. When managed with DAIR, prognosis of early cases was better than later ones (failure rate 10.4% versus 26.1%, respectively; P = 0.02). Risk factors for DAIR failure in early cases were female sex, Charlson Score, large fusions (>6 levels) and polymicrobial infections (adjusted HRs of 2.4, 1.3, 2.6 and 2.26, respectively). Propensity score matching proved shorter courses of antibiotics (4-6 weeks) as effective as longer courses (failure rates 11.4% and 10.5%, respectively; P = 0.870). CONCLUSIONS: IASIs within the first 2 months could be managed effectively with DAIR and shorter antibiotic courses. Clinicians should be cautious when faced with patients with comorbidities, large fusions and/or polymicrobial infections.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Desbridamiento , Femenino , Humanos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
Med. clín (Ed. impr.) ; 155(4): 171-177, ago. 2020. ilus, tab
Artículo en Español | IBECS | ID: ibc-195763

RESUMEN

Las infecciones urinarias son muy prevalentes entre las mujeres y cuando son recurrentes conllevan malestar a las pacientes, un elevado coste sanitario y representan una de las causas más frecuentes de uso de antibióticos. Para prevenirlas existen varias opciones que incluyen tanto tratamientos antibióticos (profilaxis antibiótica continua o poscoital) como medidas no antibióticas (medidas higiénicas, vitamina D, arándanos, D-manosa, probióticos, estrógenos, vacunas, instilaciones intravesicales), pero con diferente nivel de evidencia y, a veces, de mala calidad, por lo que se necesitan nuevos estudios aleatorizados y comparativos que permitan diseñar la mejor estrategia de prevención


Urinary tract infections are highly prevalent among women and when they are recurrent they can lead to patient discomfort and high healthcare costs, and they represent one of the most frequent causes of antibiotic consumption. There are several options to prevent RUTI which include both antibiotic treatment (continuous or postcoital antibiotic prophylaxis) and non-antibiotic measures (hygienic measures, vitamin D, blueberries, D-mannose, probiotics, oestrogens, vaccines, intravesical instillations), but with different levels of evidence, sometimes of poor quality, and therefore new randomized and comparative studies are needed to choose the best strategy


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Infecciones Urinarias/patología , Infecciones Urinarias/prevención & control , Recurrencia , Infecciones Urinarias/etiología , Factores de Riesgo , Posmenopausia , Acidificación , Profilaxis Antibiótica , Infecciones Urinarias/tratamiento farmacológico , Probióticos/uso terapéutico
5.
Med Clin (Barc) ; 155(4): 171-177, 2020 08 28.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32561190

RESUMEN

Urinary tract infections are highly prevalent among women and when they are recurrent they can lead to patient discomfort and high healthcare costs, and they represent one of the most frequent causes of antibiotic consumption. There are several options to prevent RUTI which include both antibiotic treatment (continuous or postcoital antibiotic prophylaxis) and non-antibiotic measures (hygienic measures, vitamin D, blueberries, D-mannose, probiotics, oestrogens, vaccines, intravesical instillations), but with different levels of evidence, sometimes of poor quality, and therefore new randomized and comparative studies are needed to choose the best strategy.


Asunto(s)
Probióticos , Infecciones Urinarias , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Profilaxis Antibiótica , Estrógenos/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Probióticos/uso terapéutico , Recurrencia , Prevención Secundaria , Infecciones Urinarias/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Urinarias/etiología , Infecciones Urinarias/prevención & control
7.
Infect Drug Resist ; 12: 1853-1867, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31308706

RESUMEN

The current prevalence of infections caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) organisms is a global threat, and thus, the development of new antimicrobial agents with activity against these pathogens is a healthcare priority. Ceftolozane-tazobactam (C/T) is a new combination of a cephalosporin with a ß-lactamase inhibitor that shows excellent in vitro activity against a broad spectrum of Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, including extended spectrum ß-lactamase-producing (ESBL) strains and MDR or extensively drug-resistant (XDR) P. aeruginosa. In phase III randomized clinical trials, C/T demonstrated similar efficacy to meropenem for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs) and superior efficacy to levofloxacin for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs), including pyelonephritis. The drug is generally safe and well tolerated and its PK/PD profile is very favorable. Observational studies with C/T have revealed good efficacy for the treatment of different types of infection caused by MDR or XDR P. aeruginosa, including some that originated from the digestive or urinary tracts. The place of C/T in therapy is not well defined, but its use could be recommended in a carbapenem-sparing approach for the treatment of infections caused by ESBL-producing strains or for the treatment of infections caused by P. aeruginosa if there are no other more favorable therapeutic options. Further clinical experience is needed to position this new antimicrobial drug for the empirical treatment of cIAIs or cUTIs.

10.
Int J Antimicrob Agents ; 53(2): 165-170, 2019 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30315920

RESUMEN

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of teicoplanin for treating enterococcal infective endocarditis (EIE). A retrospective analysis of a prospective cohort of definite EIE patients treated with teicoplanin in a Spanish referral centre (2000-2017) was performed. The primary outcome was mortality during treatment. Secondary outcomes were mortality during 3-month follow-up, adverse effects and relapse. A total of 22 patients received teicoplanin, 9 (40.9%) as first-line (8 Enterococcus faecium and 1 Enterococcus faecalis) and 13 (59.1%) as salvage therapy (13 E. faecalis). Median (IQR) age was 71.5 (58.3-78) years and Charlson comorbidity index was 4.5 (3-7). Five (22.7%) affected prosthetic valves. Median duration of treatment in survivors was 53 (42.5-61) days for antibiotics and 27 (17-41.5) days for teicoplanin [median dose 10 (10-10.8) mg/kg/day]. Reasons for teicoplanin use were resistance to ß-lactams (40.9%), adverse events with previous regimens (31.8%) and outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) (27.3%). Teicoplanin was withdrawn due to adverse events in 2 patients (9.1%). Five patients (22.7%) died during treatment: four in the first-line (three with surgery indicated but not performed) and one in the salvage therapy group (surgery indicated but not performed). Two deaths (11.8%) occurred over the 3-month follow-up. There were no relapses during a median of 43.2 (22.1-69.1) months. Teicoplanin can be used as an alternative treatment for susceptible E. faecium IE and as a salvage therapy in selected patients with E. faecalis IE when adverse events develop with standard regimens or to allow OPAT.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Endocarditis Bacteriana/tratamiento farmacológico , Enterococcus faecalis/efectos de los fármacos , Enterococcus faecium/efectos de los fármacos , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/tratamiento farmacológico , Teicoplanina/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Endocarditis Bacteriana/microbiología , Endocarditis Bacteriana/mortalidad , Femenino , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/microbiología , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/mortalidad , Humanos , Masculino , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , España , Teicoplanina/efectos adversos
11.
Int J Antimicrob Agents ; 53(3): 294-301, 2019 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30395988

RESUMEN

Factors influencing treatment outcome of patients with Gram-negative bacterial (GNB) multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) prosthetic joint infection (PJIs) were analysed. Data were collected (2000-2015) by 18 centres. Treatment success was analysed by surgery type for PJI, resistance (MDR/XDR) and antimicrobials (colistin/non-colistin) using logistic regression and survival analyses. A total of 131 patients (mean age 73.0 years, 35.9% male, 58.8% with co-morbidities) with MDR (n = 108) or XDR (n = 23) GNB PJI were assessed. The most common pathogens were Escherichia coli (33.6%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (25.2%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (21.4%) and Enterobacter cloacae (17.6%). Pseudomonas aeruginosa predominated in XDR cases. Isolates were carbapenem-resistant (n = 12), fluoroquinolone-resistant (n = 63) and ESBL-producers (n = 94). Treatment outcome was worse in XDR versus MDR cases (P = 0.018). Success rates did not differ for colistin versus non-colistin in XDR cases (P = 0.657), but colistin was less successful in MDR cases (P = 0.018). Debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) (n = 67) was associated with higher failure rates versus non-DAIR (n = 64) (OR = 3.57, 95% CI 1.68-7.58; P < 0.001). Superiority of non-DAIR was confirmed by Kaplan-Meir analysis (HR = 0.36, 95% CI 0.20-0.67) and remained unchangeable by time of infection (early/late), antimicrobial resistance (MDR/XDR) and antimicrobials (colistin/non-colistin) (Breslow-Day, P = 0.737). DAIR is associated with higher failure rates even in early MDR/XDR GNB PJIs versus implant removal. Colistin should be preserved for XDR cases as it is detrimental in MDR infections.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Colistina/uso terapéutico , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/cirugía , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/cirugía , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Bacterias Gramnegativas/efectos de los fármacos , Bacterias Gramnegativas/aislamiento & purificación , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento
12.
Eur Spine J ; 27(10): 2518-2528, 2018 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29728924

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The impact of deep surgical site infection (SSI) on surgical outcomes after adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery is still unclear. We aimed to study the morbidity of SSI in ASD and its impact on deformity correction and functional outcome. METHODS: Prospective multicenter matched-cohort study including consecutively enrolled ASD patients. Patients developing SSI were matched to similar controls in terms of age, gender, ASA, primary or revision, extent of fusion, and use of tri-columnar osteotomies. Preoperative parameters, surgical variables, and complications were recorded. Deformity parameters and Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) scores were obtained preoperatively and at 6, 12, and 24 months. Independent t test and Fischer's exact test were used for comparisons. RESULTS: 444 surgical ASD patients with more than 2 years of follow-up were identified. 20 sustained an acute SSI and 60 controls were accordingly matched. No differences were observed between groups in preoperative radiological and HRQoL variables confirming comparable groups. SSI patients had longer hospital stay and more mechanical complications including proximal junctional kyphosis. Infection was associated with more unrelated complications and revisions. Deformity correction was maintained equally at the different time intervals. One death was related to SSI. SSI patients had worse overall HRQoL status at 1 year and were less likely to experience improvement. However, no significant differences were recorded thereafter. CONCLUSION: SSI significantly affects the first postoperative year after posterior ASD surgery. It is associated with more complications, unrelated revisions, and worst quality of life. However it's negative impact seems to be diluted by the second postoperative year as differences in HRQoL scores between the two groups decrease. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary material.


Asunto(s)
Curvaturas de la Columna Vertebral , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica , Adulto , Humanos , Osteotomía/efectos adversos , Estudios Prospectivos , Curvaturas de la Columna Vertebral/epidemiología , Curvaturas de la Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Fusión Vertebral/efectos adversos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento
13.
Enferm. infecc. microbiol. clín. (Ed. impr.) ; 35(3): 189-195, mar. 2017. graf, tab
Artículo en Inglés | IBECS | ID: ibc-162138

RESUMEN

The incidence of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is expected to increase in the coming years. PJI has serious consequences for patients, and high costs for the health system. The complexity of these infections makes it necessary to organize the vast quantity of information published in the last several years. The indications for the choice of a given surgical strategy and the corresponding antimicrobial therapy are specifically reviewed. The authors selected clinically relevant questions and then reviewed the available literature in order to give recommendations according to a pre-determined level of scientific evidence. The more controversial aspects were debated, and the final composition was agreed at an ad hoc meeting. Before its final publication, the manuscript was made available online in order that all SEIMC members were able to read it and make comments and suggestions


Se prevé un incremento de la incidencia de infección de las prótesis articulares (IPA) en los próximos años. Las IPA plantean graves consecuencias para los pacientes y un alto coste el sistema sanitario. La complejidad de estas infecciones hace que sea necesario organizar la inmensa cantidad de información publicada en los últimos años. En estas guías se revisan específicamente las indicaciones para la elección de una estrategia quirúrgica dada y el tratamiento antimicrobiano correspondiente. Los autores seleccionaron las preguntas clínicamente relevantes y revisaron la literatura disponible con el fin de proporcionar recomendaciones de acuerdo con un grado de evidencia científica predeterminada. Los aspectos más controvertidos fueron debatidos y la redacción final se acordó en una reunión ad hoc. Antes de su publicación, el manuscrito estuvo abierto a comentarios y sugerencias de los miembros de la Sociedad Española de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/terapia , Artroplastia de Reemplazo , Prótesis Articulares , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Osteoartritis/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico
14.
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin ; 35(3): 189-195, 2017 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28215487

RESUMEN

The incidence of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is expected to increase in the coming years. PJI has serious consequences for patients, and high costs for the health system. The complexity of these infections makes it necessary to organize the vast quantity of information published in the last several years. The indications for the choice of a given surgical strategy and the corresponding antimicrobial therapy are specifically reviewed. The authors selected clinically relevant questions and then reviewed the available literature in order to give recommendations according to a pre-determined level of scientific evidence. The more controversial aspects were debated, and the final composition was agreed at an ad hoc meeting. Before its final publication, the manuscript was made available online in order that all SEIMC members were able to read it and make comments and suggestions.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/diagnóstico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/terapia , Humanos
16.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 94(3): e365, 2015 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25621677

RESUMEN

Although hematogenous pyogenic spinal infections have been related to hemodialysis (HD), catheter-related sepsis, and sporadically, to other nosocomial infections or procedures, in most recent studies and reviews the impact of nosocomial infection as a risk factor for vertebral osteomyelitis (VO) is not well established. The aim of our study was to describe the risk factors, infectious source, etiology, clinical features, therapy, and outcome of health care associated VO (HCAVO), and compare them with community-acquired VO (CAVO) cases.A retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients with hematogenous VO was conducted in our third-level hospital between 1987 and 2011. HCAVO was defined as onset of symptoms after 1 month of hospitalization or within 6 months after hospital discharge, or ambulatory manipulations in the 6 months before the diagnosis.Over the 25-year study period, among 163 hematogenous pyogenic VO, 41 (25%) were health care associated, a percentage that increased from 15% (9/61) in the 1987-1999 period to 31% (32/102) in the 2000-2011 period (P < 0.01). The presumed source of infection was an intravenous catheter in 14 (34%), cutaneous foci in 8 (20%), urinary tract in 7 (17%), gastrointestinal in 3 (7%), other foci in 3 (7%), and unknown in 6 (15%). Staphylococcus aureus was the most frequently isolated microorganism (14 cases, 34%), followed by coagulase-negative Staphylococci (CoNS) in 6 (15%), and Enterobacteriaceae in 6 (15%) cases.Compared with CAVO cases, patients with HCAVO were older (mean 66.0 SD 13.0 years vs 60.5 SD 15.5 years), had more underlying conditions (73% vs 50%, P < 0.05), neoplasm/immunosuppression (39% vs 7%, P < 0.005), chronic renal failure (19% vs 4%, P < 0.001), a known source of infection (85% vs 54% P < 0.05), Candida spp (7% vs 0%, P < 0.01) or CoNS infections (15% vs 2%, P < 0.05), higher mortality (15% vs 6%, P = 0.069), and a higher relapse rate in survivors (9% vs 1%, P < 0.05).Presently, in our setting, one-third of hematogenous pyogenic VO infections are health care associated, and a third of these are potentially preventable catheter-related infections. Compared with CAVO, in health care associated hematogenous VO, mortality and relapse rates are higher; hence, further prevention measures should be assessed.


Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/complicaciones , Osteomielitis/epidemiología , Osteomielitis/etiología , Enfermedades de la Columna Vertebral/epidemiología , Enfermedades de la Columna Vertebral/etiología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/complicaciones , Catéteres/efectos adversos , Catéteres/microbiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/complicaciones , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Osteomielitis/prevención & control , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Enfermedades de la Columna Vertebral/prevención & control , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/complicaciones
17.
Enferm. infecc. microbiol. clín. (Ed. impr.) ; 31(9): 614-624, nov. 2013. tab
Artículo en Español | IBECS | ID: ibc-117778

RESUMEN

La infección urinaria (IU) nosocomial se relaciona fundamentalmente con la utilización de la sonda urinaria (SU). En este artículo se repasan los mecanismos patogénicos por los cuales los microorganismos alcanzan el tracto urinario, así como la capacidad de adhesión y de formación de biopelículas, lo cual depende tanto del microorganismo como del tipo de SU. En la etiología de la IU del paciente sondado intervienen múltiples microorganismos, lo cual dificulta la elección de un tratamiento empírico adecuado, especialmente si se sospecha infección por microorganismos multirresistentes. En el sondado las manifestaciones clínicas son menos características y el diagnóstico a menudo es difícil. La terapéutica deberá estratificarse según el tipo de IU: mientras la bacteriuria asintomática no requiere habitualmente tratamiento, en el paciente con shock séptico la cobertura deberá ser amplia. Se efectúa un amplio repaso de las medidas preventivas


Nosocomial urinary tract infections (UTI) are mainly related to urinary catheterisation. In this paper we review the pathogenic mechanisms, particularly the route by which the microorganisms colonise the urinary tract, their adhesion ability, and their capacity to form biofilms, and are related not only to the microorganism but also to the type of urinary catheter. The aetiology of catheter related UTI is variable, and multiresistant microorganisms are often isolated, making empirical antibiotic therapy complex. Clinical findings are frequently atypical, and its diagnosis is difficult. The therapeutic management of catheter-related UTI should be stratified according to the type of UTI: asymptomatic bacteriuria should not be habitually treated, but patients with septic shock should receive a broad spectrum antibiotic. In this review, the value of the different preventive measures are discussed


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Infecciones Urinarias/epidemiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/epidemiología , Cateterismo Urinario , Factores de Riesgo , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control
18.
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin ; 31(9): 614-24, 2013 Nov.
Artículo en Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23375744

RESUMEN

Nosocomial urinary tract infections (UTI) are mainly related to urinary catheterisation. In this paper we review the pathogenic mechanisms, particularly the route by which the microorganisms colonise the urinary tract, their adhesion ability, and their capacity to form biofilms, and are related not only to the microorganism but also to the type of urinary catheter. The aetiology of catheter related UTI is variable, and multiresistant microorganisms are often isolated, making empirical antibiotic therapy complex. Clinical findings are frequently atypical, and its diagnosis is difficult. The therapeutic management of catheter-related UTI should be stratified according to the type of UTI: asymptomatic bacteriuria should not be habitually treated, but patients with septic shock should receive a broad spectrum antibiotic. In this review, the value of the different preventive measures are discussed.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/etiología , Infección Hospitalaria/etiología , Cateterismo Urinario/efectos adversos , Infecciones Urinarias/etiología , Algoritmos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/diagnóstico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/epidemiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/terapia , Infección Hospitalaria/diagnóstico , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/terapia , Humanos , Infecciones Urinarias/diagnóstico , Infecciones Urinarias/epidemiología , Infecciones Urinarias/terapia
19.
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin ; 28 Suppl 2: 18-24, 2010 Sep.
Artículo en Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21130926

RESUMEN

Acute cholangitis is a potentially severe infection of the biliary tract, resulting from a biliary obstruction. The most frequent cause of cholangitis is common duct stones. Biliary tract obstruction and secondary bacterial colonization lead to infection. In most cases, the causative agents are intestinal microflora, mostly aerobic microorganisms (and, to a lesser extent, anaerobic bacteria). The Charcot triad constitutes the most frequent symptomatology. Diagnosis is confirmed by means of radiological techniques, such as ultrasonography, computed tomography scan, or magnetic resonance imaging of the liver, in which signs of obstruction of the biliary tract can be detected and its etiology can often be determined. In most patients the treatment of choice is early appropriate antimicrobial therapy and biliary drainage, generally using endoscopic techniques.


Asunto(s)
Colangitis , Enfermedad Aguda , Antiinfecciosos/uso terapéutico , Bacterias/aislamiento & purificación , Candida/aislamiento & purificación , Colangitis/diagnóstico , Colangitis/epidemiología , Colangitis/etiología , Colangitis/microbiología , Colangitis/fisiopatología , Colangitis/terapia , Colestasis/complicaciones , Terapia Combinada , Árboles de Decisión , Diagnóstico por Imagen , Drenaje/métodos , Cálculos Biliares/complicaciones , Humanos , Intestinos/microbiología , Prevalencia , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto
20.
Enferm. infecc. microbiol. clín. (Ed. impr.) ; 28(supl.2): 18-24, sept. 2010. graf, tab
Artículo en Español | IBECS | ID: ibc-179485

RESUMEN

La colangitis aguda es una infección potencialmente grave de las vías biliares, que se produce como consecuencia de una obstrucción a dicho nivel. La litiasis coledocal es la causa más frecuente de la colangitis. La obstrucción de la vía biliar y la colonización bacteriana subsiguiente condicionan la aparición de la infección. Los microorganismos de la flora entérica, aerobios y, en menor grado, anaerobios, son los agentes causales en la mayoría de casos. La denominada tríada de Charcot constituye la sintomatología clínica más frecuente. El diagnóstico se confirma mediante técnicas radiológicas abdominales, entre las que se incluyen la ecografía, la tomografía computarizada y la colangiorresonancia magnética, en las que se detectan signos de obstrucción de la vía biliar y, en muchas ocasiones, la causa subyacente de ésta. El tratamiento antimicrobiano apropiado precoz y el drenaje biliar, generalmente efectuado mediante técnicas endoscópicas, son la terapia de elección en la mayoría de pacientes


Acute cholangitis is a potentially severe infection of the biliary tract, resulting from a biliary obstruction. The most frequent cause of cholangitis is common duct stones. Biliary tract obstruction and secondary bacterial colonization lead to infection. In most cases, the causative agents are intestinal microflora, mostly aerobic microorganisms (and, to a lesser extent, anaerobic bacteria). The Charcot triad constitutes the most frequent symptomatology. Diagnosis is confirmed by means of radiological techniques, such as ultrasonography, computed tomography scan, or magnetic resonance imaging of the liver, in which signs of obstruction of the biliary tract can be detected and its etiology can often be determined. In most patients the treatment of choice is early appropriate antimicrobial therapy and biliary drainage, generally using endoscopic techniques


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Colangitis/diagnóstico , Colangitis/fisiopatología , Enfermedad Aguda , Antiinfecciosos/uso terapéutico , Bacterias/aislamiento & purificación , Candida/aislamiento & purificación , Colangitis/etiología , Colangitis/microbiología , Colestasis/complicaciones , Terapia Combinada , Intestinos/microbiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...